Communications Department
202.626.8825
mediarelations@nrlc.org

Washington Times Letter to the Editor by Douglas Johnson

Nov 4, 2003 | PBA

What follows is the lead letter published in The Washington Times for November 4, 2003.
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20031103-100448-5951r.htm

Letters to the Editor

Aborting the facts

Writing about the partial-birth abortion ban act (“Partial birth ban wailers,” Commentary, Oct. 27), Michael Fumento wrote, “[T]he National Coalition of Abortion Providers back in 1997 estimated that the method was used 3,000 to 5,000 times annually; while a recent Alan Guttmacher Institute [AGI] survey indicates the number is steadily increasing.”

M
r. Fumento’s column drew a sharp response from AGI Vice President Beth Fredrick  (“Tracking numbers,” Letters, Wednesday). AGI is affiliated with Planned Parenthood.

Ms. Fredrick said Mr. Fumento “misrepresents findings” of the AGI survey. She repeated the 1997 estimate by the abortion-providers group of 3,000 to 5,000 of what she called “dilation and extraction” abortions, but then noted that the AGI survey of abortion providers found that 2,200 were performed in the year 2000, “contrary to Mr. Fumento’s intimation that the number … was on the rise.”

Not so fast. Ms. Fredrick neglected to mention that AGI itself had conducted an earlier survey of abortion providers, and on that basis released (in 1998) a much ballyhooed estimate that only “about 650” such abortions had been performed nationwide during 1996.

This estimate of “about 650” was accepted as factual by news organizations for years and was steadfastly defended by AGI senior researcher Stanley Henshaw, who ran both studies.

“The numbers aren’t exact, but I’m pretty sure it’s in the 500 to 1,000 range,” Mr. Henshaw told the New York Times (Dec. 11, 1998).

Mr. Fumento may have reasonably inferred that because the same organization used the same question and the same methodology in two surveys four years apart and came up the second time with a figure more than triple the first, that “indicates the number is steadily increasing.”

However, one also could conclude that the original AGI figure of 650 for 1996 was absurdly low, an interpretation supported by other evidence — such as the fact that two abortionists reported elsewhere in 1996 that they performed 1,500 partial-birth abortions annually at a single abortion clinic.

Surely, even the more-than-tripled figure of 2,200 for the year 2000 is a bare minimum.  Responses to AGI surveys are voluntary.  The 2,200 figure is just a portion of an iceberg of unknown size.

That figure is a fraction of 1 percent of all abortions, as Ms. Fredrick noted.  If a new virus was killing 2,200 premature babies annually in neonatal units, it would be on the TV evening news every week.  Keep in mind, most partial-birth abortions are performed in the fifth and sixth months of pregnancy.

Ms. Fredrick also asserted that “there is no accepted medical definition for the term” partial-birth abortion. Check out the Merriam-Webster Medical Dictionary on the MedLine Web site, which is affiliated with the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health, atwww.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/mplusdictionary.html . Partial-birth abortion is defined as “an abortion in the second or third trimester of pregnancy in which the death of the fetus is induced after it has passed partway through the birth canal.” The pseudo-medical term preferred by Ms. Fredrick, “dilation and extraction,” does not appear.

Why not just call it partial-birth abortion, Ms. Fredrick? The medical dictionary does.  Besides, it’s the law.

DOUGLAS JOHNSON
Legislative director
National Right to Life Committee
Washington

Categories: PBA