NRL News

British abortion clinic condemned by health watchdogs

by | Feb 6, 2017

11 women transferred to NHS for emergency treatment.

Editor’s note. This comes from our friends at SPUC–the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.

An ambulance outside an abortion clinic in London

An ambulance outside an abortion clinic in London

Another high-profile abortion provider has been savaged by a health watchdog over standards and lack of care for women.

A report by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has produced a litany of criticisms at a clinic operated by the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) in Merseyside.

The damning document highlighted a catalogue of safety issues, including infection control procedures not being followed, no effective systems being in place to ensure resuscitation equipment was regularly checked to protect patients from avoidable harm, and incidents not being properly investigated.

NHS concerns

The local NHS [National Health Service] trust had carried out a review because they had identified that there had been 16 serious incidents related to the service reported between January 2013 and February 2016.

The service itself reported to the CQC that 11 women were transferred for emergency hospital treatment. The women suffered serious injuries between January 2013 – March 2016, including eight cases in a 15-month period from January 2015 – March 2016.

The report also highlights that the clinic was carrying out simultaneous administration of medications for early medical [chemical] abortions, which is not in line with RCOG guidance.

Lack of care for women endemic to abortion industry

Condemning the BPAS operation at their clinic in Parkfield Road, Liverpool, Dr. Anthony McCarthy of SPUC said:

“This report focuses on a catalogue of safety concerns pointing to an inherent lack of care for women which is endemic to the for profit abortion industry.”

“There has been a cavalier attitude to safety concerns and we are presented with a series of health and safety breaches that put the lives and health of women at risk.”

No better than Marie Stopes

The BPAS report comes just a month after the country’s biggest abortion provider, Marie Stopes International, suspended abortions. MSI was blasted by the CQC in another report for putting women at risk by failing to adequately train staff and neglecting to obtain proper consent from patients. BPAS has since taken over some of the contracts to provide abortion previously held by Marie Stopes.

Can women trust them?

Anne Fearon, the chairman of SPUC Merseyside, and deputy chairman, said:

“It comes as no surprise, after the shocking revelations about Marie Stopes abortion clinics, that some of the same things are happening in those run by Britain’s other major private abortion provider. This report, which has uncovered failings in basic safety procedures, shows just how empty BPAS’ claims to care about women really are.”

“They say that they ‘trust women’, but women can’t trust them to ensure that infection control procedures are followed.”

“It’s unbelievable that this BPAS clinic has been frequently hospitalising women and is allowed to stay open. This news shows once again that taxpayers money should not be funding these private abortion clinics which show such contempt for the safety and wellbeing of women, not to mention the hundreds of children that they casually slaughter every day.”

BPAS in particular, Mrs Fearon continued, “is completely out of step with public opinion, in campaigning for abortion up to birth, and for any reason. If women are ending up in hospital after early abortions, it’s frightening to think what would happen if BPAS got their way.

Time for Ann Furedi to resign?

Dr. McCarthy also emphasised that last year Ann Furedi, the head of BPAS, openly condemned Marie Stopes for putting women at risk in their clinics, going so far as to say that she would be called upon to resign if these safety failures were found at BPAS.

At that time Furedi stated in public:

“In response to a question on how I thought my board would respond in a similar situation, I said I thought they would take it extremely seriously. A failure of clinical governance in an organisation that is a specialist provider of abortion services is of the utmost seriousness and I would expect to see it being treated as a resignation issue for the chief executive.”

Dr. McCarthy said: “This begs the question: Will Ann Furedi follow her own advice and go?”

Categories: Abortion Clinic