NRL News
202.626.8824
dadandrusk@aol.com

Pro-Life Female members of the House oppose unconstitutional attempt to extend deadline to ratify pro-abortion ERA — Part Four

Feb 18, 2020

Editor’s note. Last week, the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives passed a measure which (as NRLC explained) “purported to reanimate the Equal Rights Amendment approved by the 92nd Congress in 1972.” There were brilliant voices speaking against H.J. Res. 79. Yesterday we began by posting two of them. Today we post two more. We began today with Rep. Jackie Walorski (Ind.). Here are the remarks of Rep. Kay Granger (Tx.)

Ms. GRANGER.

Madam Speaker, we have heard my Democratic colleagues say that passing the equal rights amendment is necessary to secure basic rights under the law for women. Not only is this untrue, it obscures a fundamental fact. This ERA actually denies the most basic human right: the right to life. This ERA uses gender equality as a smokescreen to create an unlimited constitutional right to abortion.

Instead of working to craft legislation that protects women’s rights without trampling on the right to life, Democrats have put forward, today, an unconstitutional, partisan measure.

Not only would this result in on-demand abortions across all 50 States, but it would also clear the way to provide taxpayer-funded abortions throughout all 9 months of pregnancy, costing millions of dollars every year. This measure is not about advancing women’s rights, especially as women across the country, Republicans and Democrats alike, are increasingly horrified by the practice of late-term abortion and by recent comments made in New York and Virginia that lifesaving treatment should be denied to some newborns.

Allowing women to discard their unborn children at taxpayer expense is not ensuring gender equality. It is not protecting women. It is not empowering women. It is not providing women equal pay for equal work. It is simply another step down the path of devaluing all human life and dignity.

Madam Speaker, I oppose this amendment and urge my colleagues to vote ‘‘no’’ on this measure.

Categories: Legislation
Tags: