By Dave Andrusko The Supreme Court today addressed two abortion-related laws, one coming out of Oklahoma, a second from Texas. The Justices this morning left in place a decision by Oklahoma’s highest court that the state’s 2011 law on chemical abortifacients was...
Communications Department
202.626.8825
mediarelations@nrlc.org
Press Room News / Chemical Abortifacients
Cline v. Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice and chemical abortifacients
By Dave Andrusko I’m no lawyer but even I know that courts are not supposed to go out of their way to look for reasons to invalidate legislation. It is the deference a co-equal branch should give another co-equal branch. But that’s not what the Oklahoma Supreme Court...
Fill cavities, abort babies, what’s the difference?
By Dave Andrusko We’ve written numerous times about California’s AB 154 which pro-abortion Gov. Jerry Brown has not yet signed into law. A genuinely awful idea, under it physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurse midwives will perform first-trimester...
Idaho Judge’s decision Endorses Dangerous “Off-Label” Use of RU-486, Chemical Abortifacients
By Randall K. O’Bannon, Ph.D., NRL-ETF Director of Education & Research There was a lot wrong with U.S. District Court Judge B. Lynn Winmill decision last week overturning Idaho’s Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (PCUCPA). However what caught my attention,...
New Research Bulletin: The Past, Present, and Future of Chemical Abortifacients in the U.S. and Abroad
By Randall K. O’Bannon, Ph.D., NRL-ETF Director of Education & Research It is often the case that to understand the situation you’re in, you need to understand exactly how you got there. That’s certainly the case with chemical abortifacients like RU-486. And...